Recycle ~ Reduce ~ Reuse

Solder Recovery
Home
Products
Savings
Lead Free
ISO14001
Solder Quality
Case Studies
Technical
Filtration
Process Variations
Brochures
Contact Details
Press Releases

 

 

PROCESS VARIATIONS AND HOW THEY AFFECT THE EVS PROCESS

A brief summary of various wave soldering (common) combinations & options is summarised below together with the effect on the EVS process.

Fluxes - Low Rosin No problem possible
  High Rosin Watch the fumes! Minimise exposure when lifting loading flap. Ensure regular filter maintenance. Cylinder maintenance needs to be regularly performed.
  No Clean Should be no problem
  No Clean (rosin) No problem
  Organic Acid (water sol) Watch the fumes! Minimise exposure when lifting loading flap. Ensure regular filter maintenance. Cylinder maintenance needs to be regularly performed.
Waves - Single Lambda Standard machine used for soldering PTH
  Single Oscillating Adaptation of above in attempt to solder SMD - produces slightly more dross than single Lambda
  Dual/Chip Most common way of wave soldering SMD's. The "chip" wave by its nature produces large amounts of dross. A common problem is dross blockage of the chip wave producing an uneven solder wave. This can be exaggerated by leaving dross on the surface of the solder wave. Regular de-drossing is important.
  Kirsten Don't bother. Small volume machine uses oil to lubricate wave.
Treatments - Wave Oil Do not load oil laden dross into the EVS. The SRS will allow companies to stop using oil. Normally the use of oil prevents the use of No Clean fluxes. The EVS can be justified by the savings generated by the cessation of the cleaning process.
  De-drossing crystals Not that common in "mature" markets. Crystals tend to be effective when added regularly and stirred into the solder and dross. This tends to distribute the crystals and dross throughout the solder bath creating an emulsion. This may be detrimental to solder joints in some applications.
  Open Nitrogen Otherwise known as a contour wave it is not that effective in reducing dross - typically 15% less dross. Nitrogen can cost up to £1000 a month to run. The traditional argument for Nitrogen is that it is required to run a no clean process. No longer true. The modern formulations are more than capable of supporting NC technology in atmospheric conditions (try our NC213 & NW85!). The EVS can easily be justified by switching off the Nitrogen!
  Closed Nitrogen Produces much less dross, but equipment is very costly. Some customers have still bought EVS to handle the dross produced by the closed N2 system. This was not done on ROI however.
  Hot air knife

Used to debridge pcbs the hot air knife can actually produce serious amounts of dross. The cost of reworking is such that the cost of producing the dross can be discounted. With the EVS the customer can have the best of both worlds!

 

web: www.solderrecovery.com